咨询热线:024-5436364

1平6负,自22-23赛季以来B费没首发的7场英超曼联未尝胜绩(自22/23赛季以来,B费未首发的7场英超,曼联0胜仅1平6负)

添加时间:2026-01-01

Analyzing player statistics

I'm digging into some player stats for the 2023-2024 season. It seems he picked up his fifth yellow card around December, and in the previous season, he missed a game against the Spurs. I note that he has seven matches since the 2022-2023 season where he didn't start, which seems unusually high given his durability. I should present a careful analysis of significance, sample size, and potential confounding factors. Should I ask if the user wants a match list or visualization?Comparing win rates with Bruno

I'm considering comparing Manchester United's win rate with Bruno starting versus not starting under Ten Hag. Since the 2022-2023 season, it appears Bruno has started almost every game, with maybe just one occasion at the end of the season when he was rotated out.

stron

To be clear, in the seven Premier League games where Bruno didn't start, the team recorded 0 wins, 1 draw, and 6 losses. He typically has over 95% availability and acts as a creative engine with significant contributions to key plays.Analyzing set pieces impact

When Bruno is missing, Manchester United really struggles with tactical aspects like line-breaking passes and set-piece deliveries. It's also important to note that many absences occurred against strong opponents or during injury crises, and some games he came on as a substitute—so nuance matters here.

Without him, chance creation and set-piece xG significantly drop. I might suggest using Mount as a deeper midfielder and playing Garnacho or Sancho. I can offer a game-by-game overview if that helps!

这组数据更多说明B费的不可替代性,但样本只有7场,要慎读。他是英超出场时间最多之一,自22-23至24-25前期每90创造关键传球领先队内、定位球xG/助攻占比等。Discussing alternatives without Bruno

I need to be careful about making claims that I can't back with exact numbers. Instead, I can talk about Bruno as the key player for creating chances and set pieces without specifying percentages.

When he's absent, we might consider a few alternative strategies:

  • Use Mount or Eriksen in the number 10 role, noting their different pressing styles.
  • Adjust Rashford or Garnacho to work the flanks more effectively.
  • Ensure Dalot or Shaw push for more forward runs.
  • Focus on set pieces, with Eriksen or Shaw taking free kicks.
  • For the midfield trio, perhaps Mainoo and Amrabat alongside Casemiro, though rosters are uncertain.

If the user wants, I can list those seven matches and lineup details, or I could visualize the comparison of Bruno's data when starting versus not.

这数据挺直观:没有B费,联赛基本拿不到3分。

这条数据挺直观:没有B费首发,曼联联赛基本拿不到3分(7场0胜,1平6负)。补充一点背景和解读:

eries

  • 不可替代性:自22-23起B费几乎场场在,长期是队内头号机会创造者与关键传球源,还是主要的定位球主罚者;他的出场直接提高曼联的机会质量与进攻稳定性。
  • 战术影响:他提供的纵深直塞、反击中的第一时间分球、弱侧转换和前场压迫触发,队内很难用一人完全复制。
  • 数据解读要谨慎:样本只有7场;且核心不首发往往伴随伤停/密集赛程/强对手/阵容不整等干扰因素,本身就会降低胜率。
  • 替代思路(他缺阵时):
    • 中路:用“6号+双8”加强传控与前插,由技术型中场承担二线直塞与肋部三角(Mount/Eriksen/主打传控的8号分担组织)。
    • 边路:把进攻重心转移到肋部和边路三人组,放大边后卫(如进攻型边卫)的推进与传中,拉开弱侧。
    • 反击:明确9号与边锋的身后跑位触发点,用更直接的过渡减少在10号位的依赖。
    • 定位球:由技术型脚法球员接管角球/任意球,配套近柱掩护、二点包围和后点“撞线”设计,尽量弥补B费的传球落点质量。
  • 该数据背后的可验证点:无B费首发时,曼联的每90关键传球、SCA、xG和定位球xG通常都会下滑;压迫强度与反抢成功率也可能下降。

需要的话我可以把这7场的对手、阵容与比赛进程按时间列出来,或做一张“B费首发 vs 不首发”的简表对比(机会创造、射门、xG、定位球产出)。你想看哪种?